#1 Cost efficient IVF service and education in U.S. Outpatient based IVF. Complete facilities include ultrasound suite,endocrine and andrology labs, and all IVF facilities. Located at new outpatient therapy center offering the latest in laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Accomodations for visitors are nearby, safe, and inexpensive.

Ultrasound versus endometrial biopsy to evaluate the
endometrium in HRT
Title: A comparative study of transvaginal uterine ultrasound and
endometrial biopsy for evaluating the endometrium of postmenopausal women taking
hormone replacement therapy
Author: D. Archer, et al.
Address: Norfolk, VA
Source: Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause
Society 6: 201-208 (Fall) 1999
Summary: To compare transvaginal uterine ultrasound (TVS) and endometrial
biopsy for the evaluation of the endometrium of postmenopausal women taking
estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a
prospective study was conducted. Participants included 148 healthy women with an
intact uterus. Of these, 121 used oral hormone preparations and regimens
prescribed by their physicians. Endometrial biopsy samples were taken within 3
days of transvaginal ultrasound measurement. The uterus was scanned transversely
and longitudinally, with endometrial thickness measured at the thickest part of
the longitudinal plane. The thickness range in 126 women with a normal
endometrium was 1.0 to 25.0 mm. In 15 women with an abnormal endometrium, the
range was 2.8 to 23.0 mm. A significant difference in endometrial thickness was
seen between the 38 subjects taking ERT and HRT with unexpected bleeding or
spotting and the 26 untreated women in the control group. Results of ultrasound
as a screening technique in postmenopausal women who were taking ERT or HRT did
not correlate well with results of endometrial biopsy. These results indicate
that endometrial thickness determined by TVS is not a reliable indicator of
normal endometrium and cannot be used to rule out pathology.
Comment: It is an important issue and confirmation is needed. It would be
interesting to confirm this in a situation of excluding pathology rather than in
a clinical trial routine investigation. These women did not present with
post-menopausal bleeding. The are reports on the lack of sensitivity of
endometrial biopsy. With such a variety of strengths and combinations of
replacement regimens, I had hoped that in ultrasound, we had a less painful and
more sensitive tool.
HOME | The
Learning Center